© 1989 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles |
The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles
University of Bradford
Recent studies of the pragmatics of politeness have drawn on conversational data. I argue that their model can be extended to some genres of written texts. There have been two obstacles to such an extension: the lack of a definite addressee for published texts, and the dificulty of defining relevant cultural variables. Taking a corpus of articles by molecular geneticists, I assume a simple model of a two-part audience, and focus on two kinds of impositions: claims and denials of claims. With this framework, one can see politeness claims and denials of claims. With this framework, one can see politeness strategies in regularities of scientific style—such as the use of pronouns and of passives—that are usually explained in terms of conventions. The analysis also accounts for some otherwise unexplained stylistic features, such as the use of adverbs in establishing solidarity, and the use of personal attribution in hedging. With these positive and negative politeness strategies in mind, we can understand better the social significance of the occasional instances in which the writer makes an imposition without redress, or makes the imposition indirectly or chooses not to make it at all. Comparisons with popularizations, a genre in which the writer has a different kind of relation to the reader, and thus uses different kinds of politeness devices, show that these devices arise in response to the interaction embodied in the text.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. McLaren-Hankin `We expect to report on significant progress in our product pipeline in the coming year': hedging forward-looking statements in corporate press releases Discourse Studies, October 1, 2008; 10(5): 635 - 654. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. S. Mei Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance: Investigating the Strategy of Problematization in Students' Argumentation RELC Journal, December 1, 2006; 37(3): 329 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Bremner Politeness, Power, and Activity Systems: Written Requests and Multiple Audiences in an Institutional Setting Written Communication, October 1, 2006; 23(4): 397 - 423. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Harwood (In)appropriate Personal Pronoun Use in Political Science: A Qualitative Study and a Proposed Heuristic for Future Research Written Communication, October 1, 2006; 23(4): 424 - 450. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Charles The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-disciplinary Study of Theses Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 492 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Parkinson and R. Adendorff Science books for children as a preparation for textbook literacy Discourse Studies, May 1, 2005; 7(2): 213 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Martin Mourning: How We Get Aligned Discourse Society, May 1, 2004; 15(2-3): 321 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Faber Creating Rhetorical Stability in Corporate University Discourse: Discourse Technologies and Change Written Communication, October 1, 2003; 20(4): 391 - 425. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Arent Book Reviews Discourse Studies, May 1, 2000; 2(2): 252 - 253. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Hyland Exploring Corporate Rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's Letter Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 1998; 35(2): 224 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Flowerdew Interpersonal Strategies: Investigating Interlanguage Corpora RELC Journal, June 1, 1997; 28(1): 72 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. HYLAND Talking to the Academy: Forms of Hedging in Science Research Articles Written Communication, April 1, 1996; 13(2): 251 - 281. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. MYERS The Rhetoric of Irony in Academic Writing Written Communication, October 1, 1990; 7(4): 419 - 455. [Abstract]
|
|