Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1989 10(1):52-79; doi:10.1093/applin/10.1.52
© 1989 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (47)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PIENEMANN, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Is Language Teachable? Psycholinguistic Experiments and Hypotheses

MANFRED PIENEMANN

University of Sydney

In this article I demonstrate that the teachability of language is constrained by what the learner is ready to acquire. I set out a series of psychological constraints on teachability and relate these to the ‘multidimensional model of SLA’, taking a speech processing approch towards the explanation of language acquisition. This article supplies the empirical evidence for these constraints—namely experiments and longitudinal studies—which were available at the time of submission (1985). I take the position that while this research has important implications for ‘formal interventions’ in the acquisition process, the nature of such interventions do by no means follow from the research on teachability reported on in this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
P. Mennim
Long-term effects of noticing on oral output
Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2007; 11(3): 265 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
R. Erlam
Elicited Imitation as a Measure of L2 Implicit Knowledge: An Empirical Validation Study
Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 464 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
G. Hakansson, M. Pienemann, and S. Sayehli
Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing
Second Language Research, July 1, 2002; 18(3): 250 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
L. Ortega
Current options in graduate-level introductory SLA textbooks
Second Language Research, January 1, 2001; 17(1): 71 - 89.
[PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
J. Truscott
Noticing in second language acquisition: a critical review
Second Language Research, April 1, 1998; 14(2): 103 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
T. Pica
Second language teaching and research relationships: a North American view
Language Teaching Research, January 1, 1997; 1(1): 48 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
J. D. Mellow
On the primacy of theory in applied studies: a critique of Pienemann and Johnston (1987)
Second Language Research, July 1, 1996; 12(3): 304 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
M. Trahey
Positive evidence in second language acquisition: some long-term effects
Second Language Research, April 1, 1996; 12(2): 111 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
P. Robinson, S. c.-c. Ting, and Jian Jun Urwin
Investigating Second Language Task Complexity
RELC Journal, December 1, 1995; 26(2): 62 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
K. Hayashi
Form-Focused Instruction and Second Language Proficiency
RELC Journal, June 1, 1995; 26(1): 95 - 117.
[PDF]


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
R. Sheen
Double Standards in Research Selection and Evaluation: The case of comparison of methods, instruction and task-work
RELC Journal, December 1, 1993; 24(2): 1 - 28.
[PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
R. Hawkins, R. Towell, and N. Bazergui
Universal Grammar and the acquisition of French verb movement by native speakers of English
Second Language Research, October 1, 1993; 9(3): 189 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.