Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1989 10(2):138-156; doi:10.1093/applin/10.2.138
© 1989 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SPOLSKY, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Communicative Competence, Language Proficiency, and Beyond

BERNARD SPOLSKY

Bar-Ilan University

The development of a theory of communicative competence was one reaction to Chomsky's somewhat limiting definition of the scope of linguistic theory. Communicative competence, as Hymes proposed it, seemed a particularly relevant idea to those interested in second language learning. The relevance of a theory of communicative competence to language testing was first noted by Cooper (1968) and explored by Canale and Swain (1980). Language tests involve measuring a subject's knowledge of, and proficiency in, the use of a language. Communicative competence is a theory of the nature of such knowledge and proficiency. But the formalization of the theory remains a problem. A preference model appears to be a useful way to characterize communicative competence; it has many advantages over competing models. But it, too, is now challenged by the promise of models within the theory of Parallel Distributed Processing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
Y.-A. Lee
Towards Respecification of Communicative Competence: Condition of L2 Instruction or its Objective?
Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 349 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.