Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1989 10(4):418-437; doi:10.1093/applin/10.4.418
© 1989 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'MALLEY, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by KÜPPER, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition

J. MICHAEL O'MALLEY, ANNA UHL CHAMOT and LISA KÜPPER

Georgetown University
InterAmerica Research Associates
Interstate Research Associates

Listening comprehension is viewed theoretically as an active process in which individuals focus on selected aspects of aural input, construct meaning from passages, and relate what they hear to existing knowledge. This theoretical view has not been sufficiently supported by direct research which clarifies what listeners actually do while engaged in listening tasks. This study focused on the mental processes second language learners use in listening comprehension, the strategies they use in different phases of comprehension, and the differences in strategy use between students designated by their teachers as effective and ineffective listeners. The students in this study were all from Hispanic backgrounds, intermediate in English proficiency, and were enrolled in ESL classes at the secondary level. Data were collected using think-aloud procedures in which students were interrupted during a listening comprehension activity and asked to indicate what they were thinking. Findings indicated that mental processes students use in listening comprehension paralleled three thoeretically-derived phases of the comprehension process: perceptual processing, parsing, and utilization. Each phase was characterized by active processing and by the use of learning strategies. Three predominant strategies which differentiated effective from ineffective listeners were selfmonitoring, elaboration, and inferencing. The findings were related to implications for instructional practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
C. Goh
Metacognitive Instruction for Second Language Listening Development: Theory, Practice and Research Implications
RELC Journal, August 1, 2008; 39(2): 188 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
A. Phakiti
A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance
Language Testing, January 1, 2003; 20(1): 26 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
A. Mochizuki
Language Learning Strategies Used By Japanese University Students
RELC Journal, December 1, 1999; 30(2): 101 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
C.-n. Chien and Li Wei
The Strategy Use in Listening Comprehension for Efl Learners in Taiwan
RELC Journal, June 1, 1998; 29(1): 66 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
C. C.M. Goh
How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics
Language Teaching Research, April 1, 1998; 2(2): 124 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
W. Yi'an
What do tests of listening comprehension test? - A retrospection study of EFL test-takers performing a multiple-choice task
Language Testing, January 1, 1998; 15(1): 21 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
C. Jensen and C. Hansen
The effect of prior knowledge on EAP listening-test performance
Language Testing, March 1, 1995; 12(1): 99 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
J. Flowerdew and L. Miller
Student Perceptions, Problems and Strategies in Second Language Lecture Comprehension
RELC Journal, December 1, 1992; 23(2): 60 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.