Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1990 11(3):281-296; doi:10.1093/applin/11.3.281
© 1990 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LAUFER, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

‘Sequence’ and ‘Order’ in the Development of L2 Lexis: Some Evidence from Lexical Confusions

BATIA LAUFER

University of Haifa

The study compared native speaking learners of English with foreign learners, with regard to confusions of ‘synforms’ (similar lexical forms). Tests were designed in which the learners were required to distinguish between synforms often categories (ten types ofsynformic similarity).

Hierarchies of difficulty (i.e. the extent to which synforms induced errors) were produced for the ten categories of synforms for the two groups of learners. The orders of difficulty for the two groups (native and foreign) correlated at 0.83 at the 0.01 probability level. A hierarchy of difficulty was also produced for four ‘super-categories’. The analysis showed that native speaking learners andforeign learners shared an order of difficulty: suffix synforms created the most difficult synformic distinctions, followed by the vocalic, and then the prefix and consonantal.

Adopting the distinction between ‘sequence’ and ‘order’ in language acquisition it can be argued that, in learning to distinguish between synforms, all learners, native and foreign, follow a similar sequence, an overall developmental route, although the order within each super-category may differ foreach group of learners.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
C. A. Chapelle
Are C-tests valid measures for L2 vocabulary research?
Second Language Research, June 1, 1994; 10(2): 157 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.