Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1991 12(1):13-28; doi:10.1093/applin/12.1.13
© 1991 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CLARKE, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

The Negotiated Syllabus: What is it and How is it Likely to Work?

DAVID F. CLARKE

University of East Anglia

The so-called ‘communicative’ era of language teaching has seen enormous development in the area of syllabus design. The present paper considers the characteristics of a radical syllabus type known as the Process or Negotiated syllabus. This type, based on designs proposed much earlier in the field of general education, takes the basic principles of communicative language teaching to their logical conclusion. The Negotiated model is totally different from other syllabuses in that it allows full learner participation in selection of content, mode of working, route of working, assessment, and so on. It should by this means embody the central principle that the learner's needs are of paramount importance. The present contention is that the strong version of the negotiated model, involving full learner participation, would for all practical purposes be unworkable in any other circumstances than with a very small group or in a one-to-one situation. Both learners and teachers would have considerable difficulty in operating such an extreme negotiated model. However, the concept of negotiation is an extremely valuable one and it is therefore here proposed that, rather than rejecting negotiation entirely, anegotiated element might be built into each component of a syllabus. In this way, learners might be allowed a degree of choice and self-expression, unavailable in most existing syllabus types.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.