Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1991 12(3):249-267; doi:10.1093/applin/12.3.249
© 1991 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MONDRIA, J.-A.
Right arrow Articles by BOER, M. W.-D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

The Effects of Contextual Richness on the Guessability and the Retention of Words in a Foreign Language1

JAN-ARJEN MONDRIA and MARIJKE WIT-DE BOER

University of Groningen

One of the ideas that are currently gaining ground with regard to vocabulary acquisition in a foreign language is the view that inferring the meaning of a word from its context makes an important contribution towards the retention of the word in question. A precondition for this is that the meaning be guessed correctly.

In our study we investigated (1) which contextual factors influence the guessability of words, (2) how these factors influence receptive retention (after guessing and memorizing), and (3) what is the relationship between correctly or incorrectly guessing and retention (after a learning stage). The main conclusions of this study are: (1) a specificfilling-in of the factors subject, verb, and function contributes to the guessability of a word in a particular sentence context; (2) a specific filling-in of the above-mentioned factors in the process of guessing and learning has no effect on the retention (subject and verb) or a negative effect (function); (3) correctly guessing a word does not lead to an improved retention (after a learning stage) as compared with guessing a word incorrectly; for some words retention is even worse.

To summarize: the factors that are conducive to guessing are not conducive to retention, at least not when after guessing a learning stage occurs with the aid of the same context as in the process of guessing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RELC JournalHome page
S. Kaivanpanah and M. Alavi
Deriving Unknown Word Meaning from Context: Is it Reliable?
RELC Journal, April 1, 2008; 39(1): 77 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
D. Pulido
The Effects of Topic Familiarity and Passage Sight Vocabulary on L2 Lexical Inferencing and Retention through Reading
Applied Linguistics, March 1, 2007; 28(1): 66 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
S. Rott, J. Williams, and R. Cameron
The effect of multiple-choice L1 glosses and input-output cycles on lexical acquisition and retention
Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2002; 6(3): 183 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
S. M. Engelbart and B. Theuerkauf
Defining context within vocabulary acquisition
Language Teaching Research, January 1, 1999; 3(1): 57 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 RELC JournalHome page
B. Laufer and K. Shmueli
Memorizing New Words: Does Teaching Have Anything To Do With It?
RELC Journal, June 1, 1997; 28(1): 89 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Second Language ResearchHome page
F. R. Jones
Learning an alien lexicon : a teach-yourself case study
Second Language Research, June 1, 1995; 11(2): 95 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.