Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1992 13(2):185-201; doi:10.1093/applin/13.2.185
© 1992 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CAMPBELL,, R.
Right arrow Articles by WHITE, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Forced Choice Recognition of Sign in Novice Learners of British Sign Language

RUTH CAMPBELL,, PAULA MARTIN, and THERESA WHITE

Goldsmiths College
Friends World College New York
University of Oxford

Novice learners of British Sign Language (BSL) and matched sign-naive subjects were given a recognition test for possible and 'impossible' BSL signs (Experiment 1). Three list types were investigated: a list of signs known to the learners; a similar list not known to the learners; and a list of 'non-signs' formed using 'illegal' BSL formational parameters. Novice-learners were superior to non-learners on all lists. In a different population of sign-naive subjects (Experiment 2), people who tried to name the signs on presentations were significantly better than non-namers. Recognition performance was significantly better for 'legal' than 'illegal'signs in all groups and conditions.

Overall, it was rated iconicity, not knowledge of sign, that determined recog-nition accuracy. Iconicity also correlated with ease of naming where naming was required at presentation, although naming did not interact with iconicity in predicting recognition scores in Experiment 2.

We conclude that the superiority of sign-learners in this task may reflect a general improvement in the ability to process potentially meaningful gestures (which have the perceptual property ofconfigural coherence, reflected in high iconicity scores) and that naming on presentation can be one aspect of such improvement. This may be a transitory stage in the acquisition of sign as a second language.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
T. D. Tolar, A. R. Lederberg, S. Gokhale, and M. Tomasello
The Development of the Ability to Recognize the Meaning of Iconic Signs
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2008; 13(2): 225 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.