Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1993 14(1):56-75; doi:10.1093/applin/14.1.56
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GOSDEN, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Discourse Functions of Subject in Scientific Research Articles

HUGH GOSDEN

Tokyo Institute of Technology

One possible criticism of formal syntactic theory is that it is based on a philosophy and a set of metaphors which appear superseded even in the physical sciences where they were developed. Borrowing again from the physical sciences, this paper argues for linguistic theory with a philosophical basis in interrelatedness. The Dance of Shiva is adopted as a relevant and explanatory metaphor, and clause-relational analysis is identified as an approach which is contributing to linguistic theory in ways which are significant for applied linguistics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Discourse StudiesHome page
K. Hyland
Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse
Discourse Studies, May 1, 2005; 7(2): 173 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
K. HYLAND
Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles
Written Communication, October 1, 2001; 18(4): 549 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 RELC JournalHome page
T. Hawes and S. Thomas
Problems of Thematisation in Student Writing
RELC Journal, December 1, 1997; 28(2): 35 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.