Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1993 14(2):188-206; doi:10.1093/applin/14.2.188
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ZECHMEISTER, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Metacognitive and Other Knowledge about the Mental Lexicon: Do We Know How Many Words We Know?

EUGENE B. ZECHMEISTER, CATHERINE A. D'ANNA, JAMES W. HALL, CYNTHIA H. PAUS and JULIE A. SMITH

Loyola University of Chicago
Northwestern University
Loyola University of Chicago

We asked a diverse sample of laypersons (N = 69), as well as a small group of scholars (N = 5), about the number of words they knew, about the number of words in the English language, about the size of English-language dictionaries, and about other topics related to vocabulary size. Respondents in both groups typically viewed their personal lexicon as containing less than 40,000 words, and the size of their active vocabulary as no more than 20,000 words. An attempt was made to reconcile these estimates based on metacognitive knowledge of lexicon size with estimates derived from empirical studies on vocabulary size, which often have indicated a much larger adult mental lexicon. We argue that estimates of a very large mental lexicon are misleading, and that a careful analysis of the goals and methods of studies providing these estimates, together with data obtained from several recent studies of vocabulary size, suggest a more moderate-sized lexicon, one that actually is closer in size to how people are likely to respond when asked: ‘How many words do you know?’


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
N. Schmitt
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2008; 12(3): 329 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.