Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1994 15(2):201-223; doi:10.1093/applin/15.2.201
© 1994 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STUBBS, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Grammar, Text, and Ideology: Computer-assisted Methods in the Linguistics of Representation

MICHAEL STUBBS

Universität Trier

This article analyses the use of language in:

– two school textbooks of 80,000 and 30,000 words;

– a corpus of written English of 1 million words.

Two main linguistic features are analysed:

– the expression of causativity in ergative constructions;

– the expression of modality in ‘projecting’ that-clauses.

These concern, respectively, whether events and knowledge are attributed to agents. The analyses show large (statistically significant) differences in the distribution of syntactic patterns in the two books, and these differences are discussed as evidence of the different ideological stances expressed in the books. But the use of corpus data for the stylistic analysis of long texts is shown to require more detailed semantic analyses of verb classes than are currently available. The main argument concerns the relationship between syntactic, textual, and ideological analysis, and the descriptive methods required in text analysis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
P. Baker, C. Gabrielatos, M. KhosraviNik, M. Krzyzanowski, T. McEnery, and R. Wodak
A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press
Discourse Society, May 1, 2008; 19(3): 273 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of English LinguisticsHome page
C. Gabrielatos and P. Baker
Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding: A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press, 1996-2005
Journal of English Linguistics, March 1, 2008; 36(1): 5 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
K. Murata
Pro- and anti-whaling discourses in British and Japanese newspaper reports in comparison: a cross-cultural perspective
Discourse Society, November 1, 2007; 18(6): 741 - 764.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.