© 1994 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles |
Forks and Hope: Pursuing Understanding in Different Ways
Monterey Institute of International Studies
This paper comments on an earlier issue of Applied Linguistics (14/3, September 1993) on the theme of theory construction in SLA. The points made here are intended to apply to general assumptions common in our field and reflected at various points in the contributions to that issue. A perspective on theory construction is introduced that is different from those addressed there, but that needs to be included for the sake of balance. In this perspective, some common views are examined critically: the natural sciences as a success story worthy of emulation; the merits of diversity and homogeneity; the relationships between theory and practice; the nature of explanation (and the role of experimentation and causality in this); and the evaluation of theories. Ways and purposes of theorizing are addressed that complement the views expressed in Volume 14/3. It is a critical perspective, characterized by the ethical foundations of theory construction (and scientific activity in general) and the grounding of theory in practical activity, and it requires a different approach to judging the quality of work in our field.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-A. Lee Towards Respecification of Communicative Competence: Condition of L2 Instruction or its Objective? Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 349 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Perpignan Exploring the written feedback dialogue: a research, learning and teaching practice Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2003; 7(2): 259 - 278. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

