© 1994 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles |
Concord in Interlanguage: Efficiency or Priming?
University of South Carolina
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
Three positions on the acquisition of grammatical concord in second languages have been articulated in previous research, all advocating versions of an efficiency argumentthat learners delete redundant elements such as plural morphemes either because of processing, developmental, or situational constraints. The present paper proposes an alternative but potentially complementary view, that priming effects may facilitate language learners' use of concorded grammatical morphemes, particularly in tasks like written composition where language processing and attentional resources can readily be controlled. Results supporting this hypothesis are presented from analyses of 114 compositions written by French and Japanese background learners of English. Relations between efficiency and priming factors in learners' language are discussed in reference to differing task demands for input, output, and interactive language processing, as well as influences of mother tongue, proficiency in the second language, personal and social orientations, and instruction.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Mellow Connectionism, HPSG signs and SLA representations: specifying principles of mapping between form and function Second Language Research, April 1, 2004; 20(2): 131 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Mellow On the primacy of theory in applied studies: a critique of Pienemann and Johnston (1987) Second Language Research, July 1, 1996; 12(3): 304 - 318. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
