© 1995 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles |
The Aspect Hypothesis Revisited: A Cross-Sectional Study of Tense and Aspect Marking in Interlanguage1
Azusa Pacific University
This paper examines the aspect hypothesis, which asserts that verb inflections in early interlanguage systems function primarily as markers of lexical aspect independent of the target language It clarifies how developing inflections, particularly tense markers, align with aspect categories and how this association varies across proficiency level The study analyzed English interviews with twenty-six Puerto Rican college students grouped into four proficiency levels Nine operational tests were applied to 3,649 predicates to assess three dimensions of lexical aspect, which interact to form six aspectual categories Chi-square tests indicate significant interdependence of morphology and aspect at each proficiency level, Ss link, -s with states, -ing with activities, and PAST with punctual events, the latter spreading to all punctual or telic predicates among the highest-level learners The association of inflections with tense increases with proficiency level, lower-level Ss associate -s and PAST primarily with lexical aspect, higher-level Ss Primarily with tense
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Haznedar The acquisition of tense aspect in child second language English Second Language Research, October 1, 2007; 23(4): 383 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shirai The Aspect Hypothesis, the comparative fallacy and the validity of obligatory context analysis: a reply to Lardiere, 2003 Second Language Research, January 1, 2007; 23(1): 51 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Green and C. J. Weir Can placement tests inform instructional decisions? Language Testing, October 1, 2004; 21(4): 467 - 494. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lardiere Revisiting the comparative fallacy: a reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker, 2001 Second Language Research, April 1, 2003; 19(2): 129 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Lakshmanan and L. Selinker Analysing interlanguage: how do we know what learners know? Second Language Research, October 1, 2001; 17(4): 393 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wolfe-Quintero Nativism does not equal Universal Grammar Second Language Research, October 1, 1996; 12(4): 335 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

