Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1995 16(4):442-482; doi:10.1093/applin/16.4.442
© 1995 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'BRIEN, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Rhetorical Structure Analysis and the Case of the Inaccurate, Incoherent Source-hopper

TERESA O'BRIEN

University of Manchester

Educators believe that student coursework essays constitute an important learning tool in the development of conceptual understanding and linguistic expression The student essay, however, is rarely studied in any detail by texthnguists This article presents a case-study which compares a native-speaker undergraduate students performance in an examination and a course-work essay The essays were produced on the same topic within the space of six weeks Relational analysis, as conceived by Mann and Thompson (1986, 1988) in the construction of their rhetorical structure theory, was used to facilitate texthnguistic comparison of the two texts The theory is briefly introduced and relational analysis is justified as an appropriate framework The case study examplifies a contrast between an adequate handling of material in memory in examination conditions leading to a fairly readable text, and the uncertain handling of difficult source materials which results in an incoherent, almost unreadable coursework text Relational analysis facilitates the accurate diagnosis of the sources of this incoherence The findings are related to Bereiter and Scardamaha's (1987) knowledge-telling and knowledge-transforming models of writing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Discourse StudiesHome page
M. Taboada and W. C. Mann
Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead
Discourse Studies, June 1, 2006; 8(3): 423 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 RELC JournalHome page
D. Allison and Wu Siew Mei
Academic Writing: Whose Expectations?
RELC Journal, June 1, 2001; 32(1): 52 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.