Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1997 18(1):86-100; doi:10.1093/applin/18.1.86
© 1997 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SIEGEL, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Using a Pidgin Language in Formal Education: Help or Hindrance?

JEFF SIEGEL

University of New England Australia

Pidgin and Creole languages are rarely used informal education because of three arguments (1) they are degenerate languages, (2) it is a waste of time to use a pidgin or creole when the standard language is the key to success in education and employment, and (3) the use of apidgt in or creole will interfere with students' subsequent acquisition of the standard language Linguists can easily refute the first two arguments, but not the third, because of the special circumstances when apidgin or creole is LI and its lexifier language is L2 This article presents the results of research which examines the claims of the third argument This research is part of an evaluation of a preschool program in Papua New Guinea which uses Tok Pisin (Melanesian Pidgin English) as the medium of instruction and initial literacy for students who thengo on to an English-medium community school The results show that initial instruction in Tok Pisin is actually more of a help than a hindrance to learning English and other subjects


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.