Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1999 20(1):22-43; doi:10.1093/applin/20.1.22
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scollon, R
Right arrow Articles by Yung, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Blurred genres and fuzzy identities in Hong Kong public discourse: foundational ethnographic issues in the study of reading

R ScollonA1, V BhatiaA, D LiA and V YungA1

A1 Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA. E-mail: enronald@cityu.edu.hk A Department of English, City University of Hong Kong, China

This paper reports a series of ethnographic studies conducted in Hong Kong to address the problem of divergence between school-based genres and genres of public discourse, with the goal of laying a foundation for addressing the question of what genres of discourse we should be teaching. Our main concern is to locate our students' writing within the highly complex matrix of genres of public discourse in Hong Kong. Based on the concept supported by our research findings that reading is a diverse, heterogeneous and changing social practice, a complex and interdiscursive research methodology has been employed in the project. Using four interpretive methodologies: genre analysis, ethnography of communication, contrastive rhetoric, and interactive sociolinguistic or ethnomethodological analysis, we have completed five studies comprising a participant-observation study, a pager survey, a scene survey, an event survey and a readership study. These studies show the complexity of relationships among the participants within the audience and in relationship to the texts of public discourse. The results, thus, lead us to the discussion of five key theoretical issues: (1) audience roles, (2) sites of engagement, (3) reading as social practice, (4) implied readership and (5) multilingual code mixing. Regarding practices of our students, our studies indicate that their non-school world of discourse practices is highly intertextual, polyvocal and polyfocal. Our research suggests that many of our traditional academic concepts of genres and communication are in need of revision and focusing pedogogical goals on fixed genres may limit our students' productivity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 SociologyHome page
R. Rettie
Mobile Phone Communication: Extending Goffman to Mediated Interaction
Sociology, June 1, 2009; 43(3): 421 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATIONHome page
H. Osman
Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: a genre perspective
Discourse & Communication, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 57 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
F. Bargiela-Chiappini and C. Nickerson
Partnership Research: A Response to Priscilla Rogers
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2001; 38(3): 248 - 251.
[PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.