Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1999 20(3):316-340; doi:10.1093/applin/20.3.316
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rampton, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Dichotomies, difference, and ritual in second language learning and teaching

B Rampton

Centre for Applied Linguistic Research, Thames Valley University, 18-22 Bond Street, London W5 5AA, UK. E-mail: ben.rampton@tvu.ac.uk

This article questions the distinction between 'natural' and 'instructed' language learning. It first of all introduces two extracts in which adolescents use Panjabi as a second language in peer group recreation, and then shows how these contradict orthodox images of natural acquisition and classroom learning. But rather than simply dismissing the dichotomy as empirical fantasy, its important role as an ideology of language is recognized, and there is an attempt to recast it, drawing on Bernstein 1996. This is followed by a discussion of ritual as a valuable analytic concept, and it is then proposed that it may be more productive to distinguish between learning in situations in which language is bound up with an active sense of potentially problematic social, cultural or ethnic otherness, and situations where the acquisition of additional languages is treated as a relatively taken-for-granted, within-group matter-of-course. Towards the end, the article addresses some of the immediate educational ramifications of this reformulation, and it concludes with some comments on ways in which these ideas might be further explored.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Discourse SocietyHome page
G. Cook and T. Walter
Rewritten rites: language and social relations in traditional and contemporary funerals
Discourse Society, May 1, 2005; 16(3): 365 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
R. Mitchell and J. H.-W. Lee
Sameness and difference in classroom learning cultures: interpretations of communicative pedagogy in the UK and Korea
Language Teaching Research, January 1, 2003; 7(1): 35 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
J. A. Belz
The myth of the deficient communicator
Language Teaching Research, January 1, 2002; 6(1): 59 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.