© 1999 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Item versus system learning: explaining free variation
Institute of Language Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Arts, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand E-mail: r.ellis@auckland.ac.nz
This article provides an explanation for the existence of free variation in learner language. It argues that interlanguage is best conceptualized as sets of loose lexical networks that are gradually reorganized into a system or systems. Free variation in learner-language is seen as the behavioural manifestation of the lexical networks and systematic variation of the existence of a system. The article reviews previous research that provides evidence of the existence of free variation. It argues that free variation is of theoretical significance to SLA researchers because it reflects the role of item learning in acquiring an L2. Free variation arises when learners add items to those they have already acquired and before they analyse these items and organize them into a system. This view of free variation accords with current cognitive views of L2 acquisition according to which syntactic categories are extracted from items that are implicitly acquired through exposure to input (Ellis 1996).
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Taguchi Chunk learning and the development of spoken discourse in a Japanese as a foreign language classroom Language Teaching Research, October 1, 2007; 11(4): 433 - 457. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pallotti An Operational Definition of the Emergence Criterion Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2007; 28(3): 361 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. Ellis and D. Larsen-Freeman Language Emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics--Introduction to the Special Issue Applied Linguistics, December 1, 2006; 27(4): 558 - 589. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

