© 2000 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On the limitations of linguistics applied
Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Universitätscampus AAKH/Hof 8, Spitalgasse 2-4, A-1090 Wien, Austria E-mail: henry.widdowson@univie.ac.at
Linguistics has changed a good deal over the 20 years since this journal was founded, and this raises questions as to what implications this has for applied linguistics as, in some degree at least, a dependent area of enquiry. One obvious change is that linguistic analysis appears to have got closer to language experience in that it has broadened its scope to take in the externalized language of actual use. Since applied linguistics is concerned with language problems as experienced in the real world, it might appear that the two areas of enquiry in effect converge into one. This article examines two examples of such apparent convergence, corpus analysis and critical discourse analysis, where linguistic description makes claims to be directly relevant to 'real world' problems in language use and learning. It argues that in both cases what we have is linguistics applied whereby such problems are reduced and resolved by the imposition of necessarily partial linguistic account on the reality of language experience. This, it is argued, needs to be distinguished from applied linguistics, a mediating activity, more ethnographic in character, which seeks to accommodate a linguistic account to other partial perspectives on language so as to arrive at a relevant reformulation of 'real world' problems.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Sowden There's more to life than politics ELT J, July 1, 2008; 62(3): 284 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Ruhlemann A Register Approach to Teaching Conversation: Farewell to Standard English? Applied Linguistics, June 21, 2008; (2008) amn023v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Baker, C. Gabrielatos, M. KhosraviNik, M. Krzyzanowski, T. McEnery, and R. Wodak A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press Discourse Society, May 1, 2008; 19(3): 273 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Shin and P. Nation Beyond single words: the most frequent collocations in spoken English ELT J, December 6, 2007; (2007) ccm091v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Murata Pro- and anti-whaling discourses in British and Japanese newspaper reports in comparison: a cross-cultural perspective Discourse Society, November 1, 2007; 18(6): 741 - 764. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Anderson Pedagogical Rules and their Relationship to Frequency in the Input: Observational and Empirical Data from L2 French Applied Linguistics, June 7, 2007; (2007) amm015v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gardner Validating the Construct of Word in Applied Corpus-based Vocabulary Research: A Critical Survey Applied Linguistics, June 1, 2007; 28(2): 241 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Harwood (In)appropriate Personal Pronoun Use in Political Science: A Qualitative Study and a Proposed Heuristic for Future Research Written Communication, October 1, 2006; 23(4): 424 - 450. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Grabe Book Review: Handbook of applied linguistics Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2005; 9(2): 219 - 223. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Pearce Informalization in UK party election broadcasts 1966-97 Language and Literature, February 1, 2005; 14(1): 65 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. TOOLAN Le Politiquement Correct Dans le Monde Francais Discourse Society, January 1, 2003; 14(1): 69 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|