Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 2001 22(1):27-57; doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.27
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework

P Robinson

Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan

This paper describes a framework for examining the effects of the cognitive complexity of tasks on language production and learner perceptions of task difficulty, and for motivating sequencing decisions in task-based syllabuses. Results of a study of the relationship between task complexity, difficulty, and production show that increasing the cognitive complexity of a direction-giving map task significantly affects speaker-information-giver production (more lexical variety on a complex version and greater fluency on a simple version) and hearer-information-receiver interaction (more confirmation checks on a complex version). Cognitive complexity also significantly affects learner perceptions of difficulty (e.g. a complex version is rated significantly more stressful than a simple version). Task role significantly affects ratings of difficulty, though task sequencing (simple to complex versus the reverse sequence) does not. However, sequencing does affect the accuracy and fluency of speaker production. Implications of the findings for task-based syllabus design and further research into task complexity, difficulty, and production interactions are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ELT JHome page
D. Carless
Student use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom
ELT J, October 1, 2008; 62(4): 331 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
A. Phakiti
Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer's (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests
Language Testing, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 237 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
N. Taguchi
Chunk learning and the development of spoken discourse in a Japanese as a foreign language classroom
Language Teaching Research, October 1, 2007; 11(4): 433 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
M. Bowles
Michael H. Long: Problems in SLA. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007.
Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2007; 28(3): 483 - 486.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
N. Taguchi
Task Difficulty in Oral Speech Act Production
Applied Linguistics, March 1, 2007; 28(1): 113 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
D. Larsen-Freeman
The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English
Applied Linguistics, December 1, 2006; 27(4): 590 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
L. Murphy
Attending to form and meaning: the experience of adult distance learners of French, German and Spanish
Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2005; 9(3): 295 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
R. Ellis
Designing a Task-Based Syllabus
RELC Journal, April 1, 2003; 34(1): 64 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
G. Brindley and H. Slatyer
Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment
Language Testing, October 1, 2002; 19(4): 369 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
J. M. Norris, J. D. Brown, T. D. Hudson, and W. Bonk
Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based second language performance assessment
Language Testing, October 1, 2002; 19(4): 395 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
R. J. Mislevy, L. S. Steinberg, and R. G. Almond
Design and analysis in task-based language assessment
Language Testing, October 1, 2002; 19(4): 477 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
P. Robinson
Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition
Second Language Research, October 1, 2001; 17(4): 368 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.