© 2001 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Texts, corpora, and problems of interpretation: a response to Widdowson
English Linguistics, University of Trier, Trier, Germany
Widdowson (2000) criticizes two approaches to language description - corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis - which both concentrate on 'real' (i.e. attested) language. His main criticism focuses on work which combines these two approaches by attempting to use corpus data in order to remedy deficits in critical discourse analysis. He raises important points about text interpretation, and therefore about the relation between corpus linguistics and social theory. However, his argument is flawed by its misrepresentation of the data, methods and central concepts of corpus linguistics. In particular, he ignores the logic involved in comparative analyses of variable and quantitative corpus data.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Anderson Pedagogical Rules and their Relationship to Frequency in the Input: Observational and Empirical Data from L2 French Applied Linguistics, June 7, 2007; (2007) amm015v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gardner Validating the Construct of Word in Applied Corpus-based Vocabulary Research: A Critical Survey Applied Linguistics, June 1, 2007; 28(2): 241 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. TOOLAN Le Politiquement Correct Dans le Monde Francais Discourse Society, January 1, 2003; 14(1): 69 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

