Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 2002 23(3):289-322; doi:10.1093/applin/23.3.289
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duff, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Discursive Co-construction of Knowledge, Identity, and Difference: An Ethnography of Communication in the High School Mainstream

Patricia A. Duff1

1 University of British Columbia

This article describes the ethnography of communication as a viable, context- and culture-sensitive method for conducting research on classroom discourse. I first provide an overview of the method and its role in applied linguistics research and then present a study of discourse in mainstream high school classes with a large proportion of students who speak English as a second language. Drawing on social constructivist views of language learning and socialization that recognize the role of participation in language-mediated activities in people's development as fully competent members of sociocultural groups, I examine the macro- and micro-level contexts of communication within one content-area course. I focus on the discourse and interactional features associated with teacher-led whole-class discussions, examining the sequential organization of talk, including turn-taking and other features of participation, and explicit and implicit references to cultural identity and difference. The paper reveals the contradictions and tensions in classroom discourse and in a teacher's attempts to foster respect for cultural identity and difference in a linguistically and socioculturally heterogeneous discourse community. I conclude with a poststructural commentary on the ethnography of communication.

Revised December 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
S. Talmy
The Cultural Productions of the ESL Student at Tradewinds High: Contingency, Multidirectionality, and Identity in L2 Socialization
Applied Linguistics, June 9, 2008; (2008) amn011v3.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
J. Menard-Warwick
'Because She Made Beds. Every Day'. Social Positioning, Classroom Discourse, and Language Learning
Applied Linguistics, June 1, 2008; 29(2): 267 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RELC JournalHome page
R. W. Todd, I. Chaiyasuk, and N. Tantisawetrat
A Functional Analysis of Teachers' Instructions
RELC Journal, April 1, 2008; 39(1): 25 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
J.-E. Park
Co-construction of Nonnative Speaker Identity in Cross-cultural Interaction
Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2007; 28(3): 339 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
J. Hellermann
Classroom Interactive Practices for Developing L2 Literacy: A Microethnographic Study of Two Beginning Adult Learners of English
Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 377 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.