Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 2003 24(2):223-242; doi:10.1093/applin/24.2.223
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nesselhauf, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Use of Collocations by Advanced Learners of English and Some Implications for Teaching

Nadja Nesselhauf1

1 Universität Basel

Although it is widely acknowledged that collocations are both indispensable and problematic for language learners and that they therefore should play an important part in second language teaching, especially at an advanced level, learners' difficulties with collocations have not been investigated in much detail so far. This paper reports on an exploratory study that analyses the use of verb–noun collocations such as take a break or shake one's head by advanced German-speaking learners of English in free written production. First, an attempt is made to define ‘collocations’ as precisely as possible, and the methodology that has been developed for analysing learner collocations in free production is described. Then, the types of mistakes that the learners make when producing collocations are identified and the influence of the degree of restriction of a combination and of the learners' L1 on the production of collocations is investigated. While the degree of restriction emerges to have some, but comparatively little, impact on the difficulty of combinations for the learners, the learners' L1 turns out to have a degree of influence that goes far beyond what earlier (small-scale) studies have predicted. Finally, the implications of these results for teaching are discussed, most importantly the role of L1-L2 differences.

Revised October 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
N. Schmitt
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2008; 12(3): 329 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
B. Laufer and N. Girsai
Form-focused Instruction in Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Case for Contrastive Analysis and Translation
Applied Linguistics, June 2, 2008; (2008) amn018v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
J. Shirato and P. Stapleton
Comparing English vocabulary in a spoken learner corpus with a native speaker corpus: Pedagogical implications arising from an empirical study in Japan
Language Teaching Research, October 1, 2007; 11(4): 393 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
D. Gardner
Validating the Construct of Word in Applied Corpus-based Vocabulary Research: A Critical Survey
Applied Linguistics, June 1, 2007; 28(2): 241 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.