Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 2003 24(4):439-464; doi:10.1093/applin/24.4.439
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, Y.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Interphonology Variability: Sociolinguistic Factors Affecting L2 Simplification Strategies

Yuh-Huey Lin1

1 Chung Hua University, Taiwan

This study investigates variability in interlanguage consonant cluster simplification strategies within the four factors–style, gender, proficiency, and interlocutor. An experiment was designed to examine how these factors determine Chinese EFL speakers' production of English word-initial consonant clusters. Results reveal that L2 learners' performance shows its significance only when their error types, rather than error rates, are considered. The forty participants' choice of the simplification strategies highly confirms predictions made from L1 as well as L2 research results or principles concerning the four factors tested. As hypothesized, the participants' proportion of epenthesis to deletion is higher in more formal styles than in less formal styles, for high proficiency students than for the low proficiency group, for female speakers than for their male counterparts. As for the interlocutor factor, a significant difference is found between female students' speech to their native-speaker teacher and their non-native-speaker classmate. Such results not only confirm previous L2 studies on the proficiency factor, but also support (1) the characterization of learners' errors as more vs. less ‘erroneous’; (2) the ‘formal equals accurate axiom’; and (3) the claim that women are more likely to accommodate their speech to their interlocutors than males.


Received January 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.