© 2004 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developmental Trends in Lexical Diversity
1 University of Reading, UK 2 University of the West Indies, Barbados
This article discusses issues in measuring lexical diversity, before outlining an approach based on mathematical modelling that produces a measure, D, designed to address these problems. The procedure for obtaining values for D directly from transcripts using software (vocd) is introduced, and then applied to thirty-two children from the Bristol Study of Language Development (Wells 1985) at ten different ages. A significant developmental trend is shown for D and an indication is given of the average scores and ranges to be expected between the ages of 18 and 42 months and at 5 years for these L1 English speakers. The meaning attributable to further ranges of values for D is illustrated by analysing the lexical diversity of academic writing, and its wider application is demonstrated with examples from specific language impairment, morphological development, and foreign/second language learning.
Accepted December 2003.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. S. DeThorne, S. A. Petrill, S. A. Hart, R. W. Channell, R. J. Campbell, K. Deater-Deckard, L. A. Thompson, and D. J. Vandenbergh Genetic Effects on Children's Conversational Language Use J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 423 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. McCarthy and S. Jarvis vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation Language Testing, October 1, 2007; 24(4): 459 - 488. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. DeThorne and R. W. Channell Clinician-Child Interactions: Adjustments in Linguistic Complexity Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2007; 16(2): 119 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Guiberson, K. C. Barrett, E. G. Jancosek, and C. Yoshinaga Itano Language Maintenance and Loss in Preschool-Age Children of Mexican Immigrants: Longitudinal Study Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 2006; 28(1): 4 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



