Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 2005 26(1):121-124; doi:10.1093/applin/amh047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gregg, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2005

Forum

A response to Jordan's (2004) ‘Explanatory Adequacy and Theories of Second Language Acquisition’

Kevin R. Gregg

Momoyama Gakuin University

In a recent paper (Jordan, Geoff Jordan takes issue with some of my claims about second language acquisition (SLA) theory. Specifically, he queries the necessity of a property theory, and he finds my discussion of explanation unsatisfactory. In this brief reply, I try to answer his criticisms.

In a brief but interesting paper, Geoff Jordan (2004: 539) raises the issue of explanation in SLA theory. Jordan lists the following ‘key questions’ in discussing theories of SLA: (i) What is the domain of a theory of SLA? (ii) What counts as a good explanation of the phenomena in that domain? (iii) What criteria should be used to evaluate competing theories in the same domain? (iv) Is there any need to keep to a minimum the number of rival theories in a domain? He finds my answers ‘not entirely satisfactory’. I'm happy to agree with him. Still, I'm afraid I find his specific criticisms misplaced, and in what follows I'll try to briefly show why.

Received December 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
N. C. Ellis and D. Larsen-Freeman
Language Emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics--Introduction to the Special Issue
Applied Linguistics, December 1, 2006; 27(4): 558 - 589.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.