Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 2005 26(3):293-316; doi:10.1093/applin/ami010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauser, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2005

Coding ‘Corrective Recasts’: The Maintenance of Meaning and More Fundamental Problems

Eric Hauser

The University of Electro-Communications, Japan

A fair amount of descriptive research in the field of second language acquisition has looked at the presence of what have been labeled corrective recasts. This research has relied on the methodological practice of coding to identify particular turns as ‘corrective recasts’. Often, the coding criteria make use of the notion of the maintenance of meaning across turns, implicitly incorporating a theory of meaning. Through the use of empirically-based arguments, this paper demonstrates the problematic nature of this theory of meaning, and of the notion of the maintenance of meaning. However, the purpose of this paper is not to suggest ways that problems with such criteria may be rectified or mitigated. Rather, the exploration of problems with this notion is used to introduce more fundamental problems related to the use of coding. It is argued that the nature of the methodological practice of coding may be different from how it is generally understood. It is also argued that the use of coding obscures what is happening for participants in interaction. These arguments apply beyond research on corrective recasts within the field of second language acquisition, to all research on interaction which involves the methodological practice of coding.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
C. Bushnell
'Lego my keego!': An Analysis of Language Play in a Beginning Japanese as a Foreign Language Classroom
Applied Linguistics, September 29, 2008; (2008) amn033v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
V. Ramanathan
Applied Linguistics Redux: A Derridean Exploration of Alzheimer Lifehistories
Applied Linguistics, March 1, 2008; 29(1): 1 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
K. Rajagopalan
The Prerogative of 'Corrective Recasts' as a Sign of Hegemony in the Use of Language: Further Thoughts on Eric Hauser's (2005) 'Coding "Corrective Recasts": The Maintenance of Meaning and More Fundamental Problems'
Applied Linguistics, June 1, 2006; 27(2): 325 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.