Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 2005 26(3):376-401; doi:10.1093/applin/ami013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2005

Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction

Michael Swan

Task-based instruction (TBI) is frequently promoted as an effective teaching approach, superior to ‘traditional’ methods, and soundly based in theory and research. The approach is often justified by the claim that linguistic regularities are acquired through ‘noticing’ during communicative activity, and should therefore be addressed primarily by incidental ‘focus on form’ during task performance. However, this claim is based on unproved hypotheses, and there is no compelling empirical evidence for the validity of the model. Many advocates of TBI reject proactive syllabus design on doctrinaire grounds, while commonly misrepresenting ‘traditional’ classroom practice. While TBI may successfully develop learners’ command of what is known, it is considerably less effective for the systematic teaching of new language. This is especially so where time is limited and out-of-class exposure unavailable, thus making heavily task-based programmes inappropriate for most of the world's language learners. The polarization of meaning-based and form-based instruction is unconstructive, and reflects a recurrent pattern of damaging ideological swings in language teaching theory and practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ELT JHome page
P. Scheffler
Rule difficulty and the usefulness of instruction
ELT J, January 1, 2009; 63(1): 5 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
S. Springer and L. Collins
Interacting inside and outside of the language classroom
Language Teaching Research, January 1, 2008; 12(1): 39 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ELT JHome page
A. Waters
ELT and 'the spirit of the times'
ELT J, October 1, 2007; 61(4): 353 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
R. Sheen
Bill VanPatten, Jessica Williams, Susanne Rott, and Mark Overstreet: Form-Meaning Connections in SLA. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 538 - 542.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.