Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 2006 27(1):51-77; doi:10.1093/applin/ami041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2006

‘Being the Teacher’: Identity and Classroom Conversation

Keith Richards

University of Warwick

Recent debate on the standard classroom Initiation–Response–Follow-up pattern has focused particular attention on the final move and the contribution it can make to productive interaction in teacher-fronted situations. This paper suggests that current research in this area has tended to exaggerate the pedagogic impact of changes based on specifiable discourse moves, proposing instead an approach to analysis which takes account of the dynamic nature of identity construction and its relationship to the development of ongoing talk. It challenges the view that the concept of classroom conversation is inherently contradictory and, drawing on the work of Zimmerman (1998) related to the broader field of Membership Categorization Analysis, demonstrates how shifts in the orientation to different aspects of identity produce distinctively different interactional patterns in teacher-fronted talk. Using Zimmerman's distinction between discourse, situated and transportable identities in talk, extracts from classroom exchanges from different educational contexts are analysed as the basis for claiming that conversation involving teacher and students in the classroom is indeed possible. The paper concludes with a discussion of the pedagogical implications of this.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
C. Bushnell
'Lego my keego!': An Analysis of Language Play in a Beginning Japanese as a Foreign Language Classroom
Applied Linguistics, March 1, 2009; 30(1): 49 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
R. Kiely
Small answers to the big question: Learning from language programme evaluation
Language Teaching Research, January 1, 2009; 13(1): 99 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
T. S. C. Farrell and S. T. K. Kun
Language Policy, Language Teachers' Beliefs, and Classroom Practices
Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 381 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Language Teaching ResearchHome page
I. Nakamura
Understanding how teacher and student talk with each other: An exploration of how `repair' displays the co-management of talk-in-interaction
Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2008; 12(2): 265 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.