© Oxford University Press 2006
Getting Linguistic Human Rights Right: A Trio Respond to Wee (2005)
1 University of Roskilde and Åbo Akademi University, 2 University of Szeged and Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and 3 Copenhagen Business School
It is unfortunate that Wee's commendable effort (2005) to explore the theoretical underpinning of Linguistic Human Rights (LHRs) so as to explore different variants of English in Singapore empirically is marred by a substantial number of misrepresentations of what is stated in our work. We will exemplify this briefly, and otherwise refer the reader to a book that two of us are currently preparing and to Skutnabb-Kangas et al. (2001), in which much of this ground is covered, including comments on intra-linguistic variation and how this relates to the primary concern of LHRs with inter-linguistic discrimination.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Wee Responding Responsibly: Some Remarks on Skutnabb-Kangas, Kontra, and Phillipson (2006) Applied Linguistics, December 1, 2006; 27(4): 748 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
