© 1988 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles |
Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common?
The British Council Singapore
This article examines the language used by native speakers of English in business meetings. This is compared with the language taught by business English textbooks for use in meetings. The many exponents for functions that are taught by textbooks of business English are compared with those actually used in the meetings analysed. It is found that there is almost no correspondence at all between the two. This raises questions of whether textbooks are in fact teaching the correct, or the most useful or appropriate language for meetings.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Barbieri and S. E.B. Eckhardt Applying corpus-based findings to form-focused instruction: The case of reported speech Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2007; 11(3): 319 - 346. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. HOLMES Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace Discourse Studies, May 1, 2000; 2(2): 159 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Louhiala-Salminen Investigating the Genre of a Business Fax: A Finnish Case Study Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 1997; 34(3): 316 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Fang Xuelan and G. Kennedy Expressing Causation in Written English RELC Journal, June 1, 1992; 23(1): 62 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



