Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1988 9(1):59-82; doi:10.1093/applin/9.1.59
© 1988 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BYGATE, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Units of Oral Expression and Language Learning in Small Group Interaction

MARTIN BYGATE

University of Reading

The subject of this article is a data-based discussion of some possible connections between the tactics of small group oral interaction and language learning. The aim is to map out some ways in which oral interaction in SGW (small group work) may characteristically contribute to language learning, rather than merely hastening the development of specifically oral skills. After surveying previous studies of Ll and L2 learning through oral interaction, an argument is outlined for viewing language knowledge as a largely fragmented, non-homogeneous store, growing partly out of the tactical manipulation of units for specific interactive purposes, rather than a unified and integrated body of knowledge. Units of particular relevance to the study of oral language production—‘satellite units’—are then defined, and their possible relationship to the learning of language is discussed. Data is then presented and analysed in order to demonstrate some of the uses of language forms in oral interaction. It is suggested that through these uses of the formal features of language, learners engage in an aspect of language learning which is peculiar to oral interaction, and which has been largely ignored by most language courses. It is suggested that for some learners at least these features of oral tasks can be a particularly fruitful way of approaching language learning.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
M. Bygate
Quality of language and purpose of task: patterns of learners' language on two oral communication tasks
Language Teaching Research, July 1, 1999; 3(3): 185 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
M. Peacock
A Useful and Popular Lesson? Comparing Students Working in Pairs and Threes in the Esl Classroom
RELC Journal, December 1, 1998; 29(2): 27 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.