Skip Navigation

Applied Linguistics 1989 10(2):194-213; doi:10.1093/applin/10.2.194
© 1989 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLMES, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Sex Differences and Apologies: One Aspect of Communicative Competence1

JANET HOLMES

Victoria University of Wellington

This paper examines sex differences in the distribution of apologies in order to illuminate the complexity of the language learner's task in acquiring communicative competence. Apologies express negative politeness. They signal the speaker's awareness of having impinged on the hearer's negative face and restricted her/his freedom of action in some way. A corpus of apologies permits an analysis of the range of strategies used by New Zealanders for expressing this aspect of negative politeness as well as the distributional patterns for women and men. The offences which elicit apologies and the strategies selected to realize them provide clues to the kind of speech acts the community regards as FTAs (face-threatening acts) and the relative seriousness of different FTAs. As with other speech acts, apologies can serve as illuminating sources of information on the sociocultural values of a speech community, including possible differences between female and male values. Learning how to produce, interpret, and respond to them appropriately requires a thorough familiarity with those values.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Discourse SocietyHome page
M. Yaeger-Dror
Book Reviews
Discourse Society, January 1, 1996; 7(1): 146 - 148.


Home page
 Discourse SocietyHome page
C. West
Women's Competence in Conversation
Discourse Society, January 1, 1995; 6(1): 107 - 131.
[Abstract]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.