<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Applied Linguistics - Advance Access</title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Applied Linguistics - RSS feed of articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1477-450X</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Applied Linguistics</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0142-6001</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp044v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp041v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp038v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp037v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp028v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp027v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp026v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp023v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp024v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp022v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp016v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp015v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp014v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp012v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp011v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amn047v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amn046v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amn045v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp044v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp044v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this article, we examine current practices in the measurement of syntactic complexity to illustrate the need for more organic and sustainable practices in the measurement of complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) in second language production. Through in-depth review of examples drawn from research on instructed second language acquisition, we identify and discuss challenges to the evidentiary logic that underlies current approaches. We also illuminate critical mismatches between the interpretations that researchers want to make and the complexity measures that they use to make them. Building from the case of complexity, we point to related concerns with impoverished operationalizations of multidimensional CAF constructs and the lack of attention to CAF as a dynamic and interrelated set of constantly changing subsystems. In conclusion, we offer suggestions for addressing these challenges, and we call for much closer articulation between theory and measurement as well as more central roles for multidimensionality and dynamicity in future CAF research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norris, J. M., Ortega, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:51:07 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp041v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European Education: Key Findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections Evaluation Project]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp041v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) represents an increasingly popular pedagogic approach that has evolved in response to the recognised need for plurilingual competence in Europe. In this article, we present key findings from one of the first large-scale, multidimensional CLIL evaluation projects. We begin by outlining the emergence of European CLIL and by comparing it with other, non-European bilingual education initiatives and then we narrow the scope to Southern Spain, where the research was conducted. We outline the Andalusian Bilingual Sections programme, one of the cornerstones of the government's <I>Plurilingualism Promotion Plan</I> (2005), within which the research was conducted. In presenting results, we focus on specific areas that we believe make significant contributions to some of the key concerns in contemporary CLIL research including the linguistic competence of CLIL learners, the question of starting age, the distribution and functionalities of L2 use in CLIL classrooms, and the ways in which CLIL appears to be impacting on the educational system in general.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., Moore, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:51:06 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European Education: Key Findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections Evaluation Project]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp038v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving Data Analysis in Second Language Acquisition by Utilizing Modern Developments in Applied Statistics]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp038v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this article we introduce language acquisition researchers to two broad areas of applied statistics that can improve the way data are analyzed. First we argue that visual summaries of information are as vital as numerical ones, and suggest ways to improve them. Specifically, we recommend choosing boxplots over barplots and adding locally weighted smooth lines (Loess lines) to scatterplots. Second, we introduce the reader to robust statistics, a tool that can provide a way to use the power of parametric statistics without having to rely on the assumption of a normal distribution; robust statistics incorporate advances made in applied statistics in the last 40 years. Such types of analyses have only recently become feasible for the non-statistician practitioner as the methods are computer-intensive. We acquaint the reader with trimmed means and bootstrapping, procedures from the robust statistics arsenal which are used to make data more robust to deviations from normality. We show examples of how analyses can change when robust statistics are used. Robust statistics have been shown to be nearly as powerful and accurate as parametric statistics when data are normally distributed, and many times more powerful and accurate when data are non-normal.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larson-Hall, J., Herrington, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:50:19 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving Data Analysis in Second Language Acquisition by Utilizing Modern Developments in Applied Statistics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp037v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Speaking Correctly: Error Correction as a Language Socialization Practice in a Ukrainian Classroom]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp037v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study uses a language socialization approach to explore the role of Ukrainian language instruction in the revitalization of Ukrainian as the national language. Based on 10 months ethnographic observation and videotaping of classroom interaction in two fifth-grade Ukrainian language and literature classrooms, it focuses on corrective feedback targeting children's use of Russian forms and considers how these practices are shaped by the imperatives of Ukrainian language revitalization and language ideologies that valorize &lsquo;pure language&rsquo; as the sole legitimate variety of Ukrainian. The analysis reveals how corrective feedback is socializing children into speaking pure language and into dominant Ukrainian language ideologies that proscribe language mixing as a violation of the natural boundaries between languages, thus preserving a distinct Ukrainian language as an emblem of a distinct Ukrainian nation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Friedman, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:03:41 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Speaking Correctly: Error Correction as a Language Socialization Practice in a Ukrainian Classroom]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp028v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Tails' of Linguistic Survival]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp028v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Given the relatively short history of computerized corpora of spoken language, it is not surprising that few diachronic studies have been done on the grammatical features recently highlighted by the analysis of such corpora. This article, however, does take a diachronic perspective on one such feature: the syntactic feature of &lsquo;tails&rsquo; (Dik <cross-ref type="bib" refid="B15">1978</cross-ref>). The use of tails is analyzed in terms of form, frequency, and function in a 50,000 word corpus of informal conversations which took place in the North of England between 1937 and 1940. This analysis shows that tails were a systematic and quite frequent feature of spoken English at that time. It also shows that there are marked similarities in terms of form and function between tails in this small corpus and those in more widely based contemporary corpora. The article argues that the durability of tails may lie in the fact that the feature has both an important psycholinguistic function and important affective functions and concludes that this kind of diachronic research is of great potential value for spoken language research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timmis, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:08:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Tails' of Linguistic Survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp027v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Extended Positioning Analysis of a Pre-Service Teacher's Better Life Small Story]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp027v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The analysis of narrative data in applied linguistics has focused to varying degrees on their content, form, and context, with content and thematic analyses being the focus in much of the narrative research in language learning and teaching (Pavlenko <cross-ref type="bib" refid="B29">2007</cross-ref>). The aim of this article is to report on a positioning analysis of a small story about the imagined &lsquo;better life&rsquo; of a migrant, pre-service teacher. Positioning analysis operates on three levels, which together require the analyst to examine the content and characters in the story, the interactive performance of the story, and the positions that are agentively taken by the narrator vis-&agrave;-vis normative discourses. Positioning analysis thus considers content, form, <I>and</I> context. I propose and demonstrate an extended version of this approach which enables inclusion of data beyond the small story. The analysis reveals how the teacher interactively constructs an answer to the question &lsquo;Who am I?&rsquo; in her story.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barkhuizen, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:44:32 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Extended Positioning Analysis of a Pre-Service Teacher's Better Life Small Story]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp026v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Discourse Particles in Corpus Data and Textbooks: The Case of Well]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp026v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Discourse particles are ubiquitous in spoken discourse. Yet despite their pervasiveness very few studies attempt to look at their use in the pedagogical setting. Drawing on data from an intercultural corpus of speech and a textbook database, the present study compares the use of discourse particles by expert users of English in Hong Kong with their descriptions and presentations in textbooks designed for learners of English in the <I>same</I> community. Specifically, it investigates the similarities and differences in the use of the discourse particle <I>well</I> between the two datasets in terms of its frequency of occurrence, its positional preference and its discourse function. Results from the analysis show that there are vast differences as regards how the particle <I>well</I> is used in real-world examples and how its use is described and presented in teaching materials. This raises the question to what extent foreign language learners who have minimal exposure to naturally-occurring spoken interactions in English could effectively master the use of discourse particles if they solely rely on these textbooks.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lam, P. W. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:00:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Discourse Particles in Corpus Data and Textbooks: The Case of Well]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp023v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Probabilities and surprises: A realist approach to identifying linguistic and social patterns, with reference to an oral history corpus]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp023v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The relationship between language and identity has been explored in a number of ways in applied linguistics, and this article focuses on a particular aspect of it: self-representation in the oral history interview. People from a wide range of backgrounds, currently resident in one large city in England, were asked to reflect on their lives as part of a project to celebrate the millennium, resulting in a corpus of 144 transcribed interviews. The article considers the utility of realist social theory and complexity theory in the analysis of patterns&mdash;and deviations from those patterns&mdash;in both the linguistic features of these interviews and the social categories to which people are routinely ascribed. Corpus linguistic software was used to identify discourse features of the corpus as a whole, and to compare and contrast features produced by different speakers with reference to the conventional social categories used in quantitative research. These categories, with their homogenizing limitations, are challenged with reference to complex causation. The article uses the category of gender to exemplify the multi-method approach advocated.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sealey, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:00:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Probabilities and surprises: A realist approach to identifying linguistic and social patterns, with reference to an oral history corpus]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp024v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lexical Diversity in Writing and Speaking Task Performances]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp024v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the rating scales of major international language tests, as well as in automated evaluation systems (e.g. e-rater), a positive relationship is often claimed between lexical diversity, holistic quality of written or spoken discourses, and language proficiency of candidates. This article reports a <I>posteriori</I> validation study that analysed a sample of the archived data of an international language test to examine empirically to what extent such relationships exist. It is also noted that previous studies on lexical diversity in the field of applied linguistics have focused exclusively on either written or spoken discourses, no study to date has compared lexical diversity of spoken and written discourses produced by the same participants. Therefore, the second aim of this article is to understand the differences in lexical diversity between writing and speaking task performances, and to what extent the topics of the writing prompts may affect lexical diversity of written discourses. Using <I>D</I> as a measure of lexical diversity (Malvern and Richards <cross-ref type="bib" refid="B39">1997</cross-ref>, <cross-ref type="bib" refid="B40">2002</cross-ref>; Malvern <I>et al.</I> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="B41">2004</cross-ref>), it was found that <I>D</I> had a statistically significant and positive correlation with the overall quality ratings of both writing and speaking performances as well as the candidates&rsquo; general language proficiency. Nevertheless, the significant relationships were not borne out across the subgroups of the sample in terms of gender, first language background, purpose of taking the test and topics of the writing prompts. The different writing topics also had significant effects on lexical diversity&mdash;especially the topics that candidates were highly familiar with&mdash;even after controlling for writing ability and overall language proficiency. The lexical diversity of candidates&rsquo; writing and speaking performances were approximately at the same level; further, <I>D</I> was found to be a better predictor of speaking than writing performance. The implications of these findings are discussed with specific reference to the use of lexical diversity measures to inform language test validation and the development of lexical diversity parameters in automated evaluation systems.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yu, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:22:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lexical Diversity in Writing and Speaking Task Performances]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp022v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex/Gender, Language and the New Biologism]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp022v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In recent years there has been a striking shift in both academic and popular discourse on the subject of male&ndash;female differences. It is increasingly common for biological explanations to be proposed for differences that had previously been treated by most investigators as effects of socio-cultural factors. This article critically examines the arguments as they apply to the specific case of male&ndash;female differences in linguistic behaviour. It concludes that the relevant linguistic research evidence does not on balance support the new biologism; that evidence is more adequately accounted for using the socio-cultural approaches which most linguistic researchers favour.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cameron, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:24:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex/Gender, Language and the New Biologism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp016v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp016v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The call for longitudinal evidence on the efficacy of written corrective feedback (WCF) for ESL (English as a second language) writers has been made repeatedly since Truscott (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="B59">1996</cross-ref>) claimed that it is ineffective, harmful, and should therefore be abandoned. This article discusses some of the theoretical issues raised against the practice, outlines the status of recent empirical evidence and presents a 10-month study of the effects of WCF on two functional uses of the English article system given to 52 low-intermediate ESL students in Auckland, New Zealand. Assigned to four groups (direct corrective feedback, written, and oral meta-linguistic explanation; direct corrective feedback and written meta-linguistic explanation; direct corrective feedback only; the control group), the students produced five pieces of writing (pre-test, immediate post-test, and three delayed post-tests). Each of the treatment groups outperformed the control group on all post-tests and no difference in effectiveness was found between the three treatment groups.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bitchener, J., Knoch, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:19:40 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp015v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Comprehension of wh-Questions by Korean Learners of English]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp015v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Previous studies on English as a second language (L2) argue for the relative ease of object <I>wh</I>-questions based on the finding that L2 learners are more accurate and faster in judging the grammaticality of object <I>wh</I>-questions than that of subject <I>wh</I>-questions in English. This article re-examines this claim by investigating L2 learners&rsquo; comprehension of long-distance <I>wh</I>-questions at different stages of English acquisition. A total of 113 Korean-speaking learners of English with different years of English instruction participated in a picture-based comprehension task. Contrary to previous studies, the results of the present study point toward a strong preference for subject <I>wh</I>-questions to object <I>wh</I>-questions. The learners were more accurate and improved faster in subject <I>wh</I>-questions than in object <I>wh</I>-questions. In addition, they showed a strong tendency to interpret object <I>wh</I>-questions as subject <I>wh</I>-questions. These results are in line with distance-based accounts of processing complexity. Subject <I>wh</I>-questions are easier to process because the distance between the <I>wh</I>-word and the gap is shorter and therefore poses less burden on working memory in subject <I>wh</I>-questions than in object <I>wh</I>-questions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, J.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:07:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Comprehension of wh-Questions by Korean Learners of English]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp014v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[English in Advertising: Generic Intertextuality in a Globalizing Media Environment]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp014v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Across the globe, the use of English is a popular advertising technique. The ever expanding body of studies on this topic has revealed a number of explanations for the use of English in the advertising. It can be related to the larger marketing strategy of a campaign, to the cultural connotations English carries, or English can be used for creative-linguistic reasons. The current article, however, will present an analysis of four examples of advertisements in which English is used for reasons that have not been discussed in the scholarly literature so far. More specifically, in these advertisements, which intertextually refer to a range of British and American media genres, specific registers of English are used to mark the generic intertextuality of the ads. The analysis, I believe, sheds new light on the use of English in the media, and more particularly on issues such as viewers&rsquo; agency and linguistic superiority.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuppens, A. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:16:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[English in Advertising: Generic Intertextuality in a Globalizing Media Environment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp012v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seizure, Fit or Attack? The Use of Diagnostic Labels by Patients with Epileptic or Non-epileptic Seizures]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp012v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We present an analysis of the use of diagnostic labels such as <I>seizure</I>, <I>attack</I>, <I>fit</I>, and <I>blackout</I> by patients who experience seizures. While previous research on patients&rsquo; preferences for diagnostic terminology has relied on questionnaires, we assess patients&rsquo; own preferences and their responses to a doctor's use of different labels through the qualitative and quantitative analysis of doctor&ndash;patient interactions in a realistic clinical setting. We also examine whether two sub-groups of patients&mdash;those with epileptic seizures and those with (psychogenic) non-epileptic seizures&mdash;show different behaviours in this respect. Our findings suggest first that patients make fine lexical distinctions between the various diagnostic labels they use to describe their seizure experiences; secondly, that patients play an active role in the development and application of labels for their medical complaint; and thirdly, that attention to patients&rsquo; lexical choices and interactive use or avoidance of labels can be relevant for the differential diagnosis of seizures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plug, L., Sharrack, B., Reuber, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:15:06 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seizure, Fit or Attack? The Use of Diagnostic Labels by Patients with Epileptic or Non-epileptic Seizures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp011v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Relationship between Applied Linguistic Research and Language Policy for Bilingual Education]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amp011v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Currently, restrictive-language policies seem to threaten bilingual education throughout the USA. Anti-bilingual education initiatives have passed easily in California, Arizona, and Massachusetts; while one was closely defeated in Colorado, and federal education policy has re-invigorated the focus on English education for English language learners, while concomitantly obfuscating the possibility of native language maintenance and developmental bilingual education. This is the educational landscape within which bilingual education researchers, educators, and students must face the formidable challenge of preserving educational choice and bilingual education. Thus, substantive research is needed on how bilingual educators navigate this challenging ideological and policy landscape. Based on an ethnographic study of bilingual education language policy, this article takes up this challenge by focusing on how beliefs about <I>Applied Linguistics</I> research influence the interpretation and appropriation of federal language policy in one US school district. The results have implications for the relationship between the <I>Applied Linguistic</I> research community and language policy processes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson, D. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 05:43:18 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amp011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Relationship between Applied Linguistic Research and Language Policy for Bilingual Education]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amn047v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Style Shifts among Japanese Learners before and after Study Abroad in Japan: Becoming Active Social Agents in Japanese]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amn047v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Previous studies on L2 Japanese sojourners often reported that learners overuse the plain style or haphazardly mix the plain and polite styles upon return. These styles, which are often associated with formal or informal contexts, also index complex social and situational meanings, and native speakers are reported to shift their styles to create desired contexts. In order to better understand L2 development of the use of the plain and polite styles during study abroad, the current study examined the use of the polite/plain styles and style shifts among five English-speaking male students who studied in Japan for one academic year by comparing their performances both quantitatively and qualitatively in oral proficiency interviews before and after they studied abroad. Upon return, three predominantly used the polite style talking to the interviewer (their former teacher), while two primarily used the plain style. Though the quantitative analysis may lead one to conclude that these two students regressed in their pragmatic competence, the qualitative analysis revealed that all five learners gained some understanding of social meanings of the plain and polite styles and became more active social agents who make decisions to shift the styles.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iwasaki, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:39:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amn047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Style Shifts among Japanese Learners before and after Study Abroad in Japan: Becoming Active Social Agents in Japanese]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-12-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amn046v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Practices of other-initiated repair in the classrooms of children with specific speech and language difficulties]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amn046v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Repair practices used by teachers who work with children with specific speech and language difficulties (SSLDs) have hitherto remained largely unexplored. Such classrooms therefore offer a new context for researching repairs and considering how they compare with non-SSLD interactions. Repair trajectories are of interest because they are dialogic sites where the child's meaning is being negotiated and, therefore, where adults might create opportunities for language learning. The interactions take place during activities, such as story writing, where teachers elicit children's ideas and orient to their lack of clarity. From a data set of 78 cases, four significant patterns of teacher repair initiation emerged. First, non-specific repair initiators (RIs), such as &lsquo;say that again&rsquo;, target any aspect of the prior turn and reveal the adult's lack of grasp of its content. Next, specific RIs (&lsquo;she has&rsquo;) that are constructed with minimal components of the child's turn, pinpoint the location of the trouble but provide no new lexical information. In contrast, specific RIs that are constructed as &lsquo;wh&rsquo; questions (&lsquo;down where&rsquo;), target the nature of the trouble and elicit further information. Finally, offers of candidates (&lsquo;do you mean X&rsquo;) do provide new models of lexis but do not elicit repetition from the child.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Radford, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:45:16 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amn046</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Practices of other-initiated repair in the classrooms of children with specific speech and language difficulties]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-12-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amn045v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Textual Appropriation and Citing Behaviors of University Undergraduates]]></title>
<link>http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/amn045v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article explores the citing behaviors of 16 undergraduates in a North American university. After completing a research paper for their disciplinary courses, each participating student was interviewed to identify in his/her writing words and ideas borrowed from source texts and to explain why and how the relevant texts were appropriated with or without citations. Analysis of students&rsquo; writing and comments illustrates how they relied on source texts for various aspects of their essays, some of which they believed required citations while some of which did not. Results showed that they tried to strike a balance between the need to cite published authors to gain credit for the scholarly quality of their writing and the desire to establish their own voice by limiting the extent to which they cited other texts. Some students also reported how they chose between quoting and paraphrasing (though the latter sometimes contained direct copying) on the basis of their ability to rephrase other's words and their understanding of the different roles played by the two. The study indicates the degree to which citational acts are discursive markings of learning and knowledge construction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shi, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:55:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/applin/amn045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Textual Appropriation and Citing Behaviors of University Undergraduates]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Applied Linguistics</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-12-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>